Every few months, the internet rediscovers the same idea: “What if you chose a bad name on purpose? At least people will talk about you.” It’s tempting. A clumsy or offensive name might generate buzz, memes, or even headlines. But here’s the reality: buzz doesn’t always build brands.
There’s no doubt that controversial or awkward names spark discussion:
Yes—people talk about them. But the question is: does that talk convert into trust, loyalty, and sales?
It’s important to distinguish between controversial names and truly bad names.
Controversy can spark conversation. Badness just creates barriers.
Bad names don’t age well. They may create noise, but rarely long-term equity.
For some niches, controversy or humour can be a feature:
But in each case, the controversy fits the brand strategy and target audience. It’s not random—it’s calibrated.
The biggest mistake? Treating naming as a casual joke or PR stunt.
Naming is strategy. It influences investor trust, customer adoption, and long-term growth. That’s why:
A naming expert sees beyond the buzz to the actual business impact.
A controversial name can sometimes work—if it’s intentional, researched, and fits your brand. A bad name, however, will always just be a bad name.
At Namudio, we believe names should be more than headlines. They should be assets—built to resonate, to scale, and to create lasting value. Because attention fades fast, but a strong name compounds for decades.