Why “ChatGPT” Is a Problematic Name

1. It’s Descriptive, Not Distinctive

The name literally explains what it is: a chat system built on GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer). That’s functionality, not brand. Strong trademarks stand apart; they don’t just describe the tool.

2. It Leans on Generic Industry Terms

“Chat” is used by every conversational product. “GPT” is the model architecture itself. Put together, it’s a technical label, not a brand identity.

3. It Restricts the Industry

If “ChatGPT” were registered as a trademark, it would unfairly block others from describing their own GPT-based chat products. That’s why trademark authorities flagged it as too generic.

‍

Trademark 101 for Brand Builders

To secure protection, a name must be:

• Distinctive — not purely descriptive of what it does.
• Non-confusing — clearly separate from existing marks.
• Non-deceptive — not misleading in meaning or origin.

“ChatGPT” ticks none of these boxes. It describes, it blends in, and it doesn’t stand out.

‍

Lessons From Other Industries

Some renames and brand pivots show how to do it right:

• BackRub → Google: quirky, abstract, unforgettable.
• Facebook → Meta: controversial, but strategically distinct.
• Appboy → Braze: evolved beyond product category into a brand identity.

Each shift created distinctiveness and defensibility. That’s the playbook OpenAI skipped.

‍

What OpenAI Should Do Next

If OpenAI wants ChatGPT to endure as a brand and not just a product label, it needs a rebrand strategy:

1. Find Distinctiveness – Choose a name that carries story, ambition, and emotional resonance.
2. Secure Protection – Run full trademark and domain checks before launch.
3. Test with Markets – Validate that the name resonates with target users globally.
4. Launch Boldly – Announce the rebrand as an evolution, not an apology.

Done right, this would give OpenAI a scalable identity for its conversational AI — one that doesn’t collapse under generic use.

‍

Closing Thought

ChatGPT will always be remembered as the product that brought generative AI to the masses. But as a brand name, it lacks the power and protection of the world’s strongest trademarks.

At Namudio, we see this mistake often: brilliant technology saddled with a descriptive name. The fix? Crafting names that aren’t just functional labels, but strategic assets — defensible, memorable, and built to last.